Our missing LR101 motor was finally returned to us. After sitting idle for 6 months it has accumulated quite a bit of visible surface rust on the exterior. The motors are entirely 4130 steel except for a copper wire which spirals between the walls forming the cooling passages. We're not sure how much rust may be in the cooling passages since they are nearly impossible to inspect. I took this motor to Sheffield Platers to have them electroless nickel plate it. I'm hoping this will clean off all the rust and offer protection from further rusting. They said it will cost $90. In the mean time, Steve Harrington (our other rocket project adviser and head honcho at Flometrics... and my boss) has offered us one of Flometrics LR101 motors, which we have begun to modify for use in our system. This involves cutting off the spindles which were orginally used to mount & gimbal the motor. Also, a hole is tapped so that a AN fitting can be screwed to the motor to plumb the kerosene in (see picture below).

Rust has been an enemy to us in the past. We have had injectors completely clog up with rust particles that were in the cooling passages. If we use this motor we'll have to make sure the inside is free of rust since the cooling passages were never plated in the original Rocketdyne process. Someone in the past suggested we recirculate naval jelly through the cooling passages which seems to work pretty well, so we will do that as a precaution. Also, sometime ago I made the tooling to make filter screens for the LOX and Kerosene. The screens nest over the injector.




I hope to send out drawings to have these parts quoted in the next week or two. I also need to talk to our welder to determine what details/features he will need to make these parts weldable. Ideally I'd like to have them made from stainless steel to, once and for all, put this rusting issue to bed, however, a proper thermal analysis will need to be done, since stainless doesn't have the thermal conductivity the existing 4130 steel has.Igniters
The original motor used hypergols for ignition. I have been told by a Rocketdyne engineer familar with these motors that a pyrotechnic igniter will work and the flames should spread out radially as close to the injector face as possible to insure propellant ignition without letting too much liquid propellant build up in the combustion chamber. These are sometimes referred to as radial outward-firing igniters or ROFI's.
No one on our team has a pyrotechnics license, so we will have to count on others for an igniter.


We tested it by connecting the nichrome wires to long leads and touching them to a 12VDC battery. As soon as I can figure out how to post videos, I'll do so! Just as expected fire came out of the radial ports, however, it wasn't as uniform as I would have expected. Maybe 5 ports was too many. Perhaps 4 1/8" diameter ports will create more back pressure and better distribute flamey stuff from all the ports. The flare igniter burned for over 30 seconds, but by 15-20 seconds the phenolic casing was starting to burn through.
Plumbing
The Soft Start Pressurization System was finally plumbed to each of the propellant tanks tanks. A check valve goes between the SSPS and each tank to insure that no cross-contamination from propellant vapors can occur.
A small leak was found in a helium fill line fitting. We fill the composite pressurant tank through the Circle Seal regulator in the SSPS. The fitting is a straight adapter -- 3/16" tube to 1/8" NPT. The tubing then has to make a 180 degree bend and was probably stressesd. We'll replace it with a 90 degree elbow adapter. I've ordered new fittings.
Next we will plumb the MPVA to the motor via flex hoses. If our motors aren't ready we'll probably add some orifices to each propellant line to similuate the pressure drop through the motor and start high pressure and cryotesting. Paul Breed has offered to let us use the balance of a LN2 dewar he just ordered.
--- Carl
9 comments:
That's a pretty sexy lookin' filter there too guy! I still have the blueprints for Garvey's ablative motor, which I will bring next time I come to the work day, assuming they're still every Sunday till launch.
Is the stainless motor you designed regenerative also?
We still need to do a proper thermal analysis to make sure the stainless will work, but yes, it is a regenerative motor.
Do you mean the blueprints for the RRS/Dave Crrisalli motor, the 600 lbf motor?
--- Carl
On the new build LR-101s: Why stainless, or indeed any kind of steel? You aren't bound to the decisions of the original designers wrt materials choice. You could, for instance, try aluminum or a weldable cupro-nickel. Both options get you out of major corrosion issues and raise the heat conductivity above that of the original 4130 steel. The aluminum might require heat-treating (you'd have to analyze it), but the cupro-nickel wouldn't.
On the ignition issue: Why not have a go at spark ignition? They're trickier than they look, but they are also inexpensive to work with and a good learning experience. And you don't need a pyro license for them, either.
Pierce,
Good points! I don't have a good feeling yet about an aluminum motor. Most aluminum motors I'm aware of are either billet, small, or burn for such a short time they probably never reach thermal equilibrium. I thought about copper, but I have only heard about machined billet motors (i.e. like Mastens) and not formed sheet motors. The Cupro-nickel is interesting. I'm curious about the weldability. The stainless seemed easiest to weld and I'm sure the heat transfer can be managed. Keep it coming...
--- Carl
Pierce,
A quick web search finds the thermal conductivity of 4130 steel is 42.7 W/(m*K)
cupro-nickel as 29.4 W/(m*K)or onlyy about 2/3 as good as 4130.
304 Stainless is 16.2 W/(m*K)... much worse than 4130 or cupro-nickel.
Aluminum is almost 4 x better than the existing 4130 steel at 180 W/(m*K).
Telerium copper is 354 W/(m*K).
I found it interesting that Nickel 200 is 70.2 W/(m*K). Is it weldable?
--- Carl
I didn't realize 4130 was that good -- maybe you ought to stay with that. With plating and care, you should be able to deal with the rust issue. I'd be very chary about going with anything with a lower thermal conductivity. AFAIK, Nickel is probably weldable, but I am not sure. Check with a high grade welding shop to be sure.
We (MSS) haven't done formed sheet motors up to this point because the tooling is more expensive that having them machined for the size of engine we're doing, especially for the very short runs we've done so far. I'd love to see what you could do with a formed sheet motor. One other thing to consider -- copper is not generally considered to be weldable. This would be a serious problem for reproducing an LR101 in straight copper.
A web search finds that nickel is weldable... however, pricing is scarce which leads me to believe it is exorbitant. It looks like it can be machined with HSS tools and most cutting fluids.
If a copper motor were done I imagine it would have to be brazed... probably furnace brazed. My understanding of brazing copper is that it becomes dead soft and the only way to re-anneal it is to work harden it. You could design with the dead-soft properties in mind.
--- Carl
Do you mean the blueprints for the RRS/Dave Crrisalli motor, the 600 lbf motor?
Yup, that's the one.
Post a Comment